Accessibility
20ptsCan every parent, student, and staff member actually use this site?
6 weighted criteria
Most school sites are reviewed against opinion. This is reviewed against criteria. Seven categories, weighted by what actually moves enrollment, accessibility risk, and search visibility — used on every URCO audit.
Every audit is scored against the same 100-point framework — seven categories, weighted by what actually moves enrollment, accessibility risk, and search visibility. No vibes, no opinions, no "looks great." Just where the points are and where they aren’t.
Can every parent, student, and staff member actually use this site?
6 weighted criteria
Can Google understand this school well enough to rank it where families search?
6 weighted criteria
Can a busy parent on a phone find what they need in under 30 seconds?
6 weighted criteria
Is it obvious what a parent should do next?
5 weighted criteria
Does the school actually know what is producing inquiries?
5 weighted criteria
Is the site organized the way parents actually search and decide?
5 weighted criteria
Why should a family trust this school over the alternatives down the road?
5 weighted criteria
Each finding is logged with severity, fix effort, and the criterion it fails — so the report doubles as the remediation plan.
This is the working framework — what each category means, what specific things we look for, and how the points add up. Schools score themselves first; we then score them independently and compare.
Can every parent, student, and staff member actually use this site?
WCAG 2.2 AA is the legal floor for public-facing school communication under ADA Title II/III and Section 504. We score against the floor, not vibes.
Can Google understand this school well enough to rank it where families search?
A school can be the best in the district and still be invisible to a parent searching "charter school in Gilbert." Technical SEO is the part Google reads before any human does.
Can a busy parent on a phone find what they need in under 30 seconds?
Most school inquiries start on a phone, between two other things. If the answer to "what grades, how much, when can I tour" is more than two taps away, the parent leaves.
Is it obvious what a parent should do next?
Inquiry, tour, application, call. Schools usually have all four somewhere — but they rarely point at them clearly, repeat them across pages, or measure which one starts the relationship.
Does the school actually know what is producing inquiries?
Most schools have Google Analytics installed and almost no one reads it. Worse, "form submit" rarely fires correctly. If you can't attribute an inquiry to a source, you can't spend on the next one.
Is the site organized the way parents actually search and decide?
Schools often organize their site the way the org chart looks. Parents search for "tuition," "grades," "schedule a tour" — not "Office of Admissions Communications."
Why should a family trust this school over the alternatives down the road?
Trust closes the gap between "interested" and "scheduled a tour." Most school sites under-show outcomes, leadership, and real student life — the things parents actually weigh.
See where your school site scores against the framework — written report, prioritized register, and a 60-minute walkthrough.
Book an audit →Build a website that is accessible, search-ready, conversion-aware, and built to perform.